Scientists Still Search for an Answer

Scientists Still Search for an Answer (HM1D15)

Location: Olympia, WA 98512 Thurston County
Country: United States of America

N 46° 54.272', W 123° 2.918'

  • 0 likes
  • 0 check ins
  • 0 favorites
  • 152 views
Inscription
More than 30 explanation have been proposed for the origin of the Mima Mounds, but none has been proven.

Were the Mounds Created by Glacial Ice?
In 1913 glacial geologist J Harlan Bretz completed the first detailed study of the Mima Mounds. Bretz suggested that gravel, stones and soil washed onto the melting ice age glacier might have collected in pits, called suncups. As the ice melted, the sediment pits would have settled in mounded shapes.

Created by Earthquakes?
Andrew Berg suggested that mounds might form when earthquakes generate vibrational shock waves that travel through the soil. In this hypothesis, the soil would move the most where wave peaks intersect with each other (blue dots), and tend to collect as mounds in the places where the waves cancel each other out (white dots).

Origin of Mound Sediments?
Some scientists have proposed that the Mima Mounds are made of deposits from sediment rich floods from a glacially dammed lake. Other scientists added a new twist by suggesting that the mounds are sediment that collected where the water flowed around vegetation. Their views are known as fluvial deposition hypotheses.

Caused by Erosion?
Explorers and scientists since the mid-1800s have proposed a variety of mound hypotheses based on erosion from glacial meltwater. In 1988 glaciologist A.L. Washburn reviewed the evidence for and against all the mound hypotheses to date. He favored hypotheses based on runoff erosion with vegetation anchoring. In these hypotheses, runoff from glacial meltwater eroded the soil between trees or shrubs, leaving mounds around the plants.

The Work of Small Pocket Gophers?
In the 1940s Walter Dalquest and Victor Scheffer proposed that the mounds were formed by pocket gophers excavating nest chambers. Several scientists continue to work on this hypothesis today. They suggest that after the glaciers retreated and vegetation grew on the thin soil, pocket gophers came in from unglaciated country. The gophers began to dig nest chambers, but encountered the dense layer of glacial debris beneath the soil. They moved soil and pebbles upward, forming a mound. Pocket gophers are territorial; the center of each mound is the center of a pocket gopher's territory.

The Result of Permafrost Cracking?
This explanation suggests that frozen ground—or permafrost—at the end of the glacier cracked into many-sided shapes. Ice formed wedges in the cracks. As the climate warmed and the ice melted, the soil was left in mounded shapes.
Details
HM NumberHM1D15
Tags
Placed ByWashington State Department of Natural Resource
Marker ConditionNo reports yet
Date Added Sunday, September 28th, 2014 at 6:45pm PDT -07:00
Pictures
Sorry, but we don't have a picture of this historical marker yet. If you have a picture, please share it with us. It's simple to do. 1) Become a member. 2) Adopt this historical marker listing. 3) Upload the picture.
Locationbig map
UTM (WGS84 Datum)10T E 496296 N 5194556
Decimal Degrees46.90453333, -123.04863333
Degrees and Decimal MinutesN 46° 54.272', W 123° 2.918'
Degrees, Minutes and Seconds46° 54' 16.32" N, 123° 2' 55.08" W
Driving DirectionsGoogle Maps
Area Code(s)360
Closest Postal AddressAt or near 13549 Mima Rd SW, Olympia WA 98512, US
Alternative Maps Google Maps, MapQuest, Bing Maps, Yahoo Maps, MSR Maps, OpenCycleMap, MyTopo Maps, OpenStreetMap

Is this marker missing? Are the coordinates wrong? Do you have additional information that you would like to share with us? If so, check in.

Check Ins  check in   |    all

Have you seen this marker? If so, check in and tell us about it.

Comments 0 comments

Maintenance Issues
  1. Is this marker part of a series?
  2. What historical period does the marker represent?
  3. What historical place does the marker represent?
  4. What type of marker is it?
  5. What class is the marker?
  6. What style is the marker?
  7. Does the marker have a number?
  8. What year was the marker erected?
  9. This marker needs at least one picture.
  10. Can this marker be seen from the road?
  11. Is the marker in the median?